What is the correct order of The Hobbit movies?

İçindekiler:

  1. What is the correct order of The Hobbit movies?
  2. Should I watch The Hobbit or LOTR first?
  3. Is The Hobbit a prequel to Lord of the Rings?
  4. Why is The Hobbit 3 movies?
  5. What's next after Hobbit trilogy?
  6. How old is Gandalf?
  7. Is Hobbit worth watching?
  8. Is The Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings?
  9. How old is Gollum?
  10. Why is The Hobbit so bad?
  11. Why did The Hobbit trilogy fail?
  12. How tall is Gandalf?
  13. Is Gandalf a human?
  14. Who is better Gandalf or Dumbledore?
  15. Are the Hobbit movies good Reddit?
  16. Is Hobbit worth watching Reddit?
  17. Why is The Hobbit book so good?
  18. Did Gollum eat babies?
  19. How old is Frodo human years?
  20. Why does The Hobbit look so fake?

What is the correct order of The Hobbit movies?

The three films are The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012), The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013), and The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (2014). The films are based on the 1937 novel The Hobbit by J. R. R.

Should I watch The Hobbit or LOTR first?

Order: Watch the full “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, followed by “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” and “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” ending in theaters with “The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.”

Is The Hobbit a prequel to Lord of the Rings?

A prequel to The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit Trilogy is set 60 years before Frodo embarks on his epic journey, and Peter Jackson's use of stunning New Zealand landscapes will make the tale all the more enchanting.

Why is The Hobbit 3 movies?

In a documentary that appeared as a bonus feature on the home media release of The Hobbit, the celebrated director and his crew revealed that a disorganized production and a lack of planning time after taking over from del Toro played a part in turning the 300-odd page novel into a trilogy of movies.

What's next after Hobbit trilogy?

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) The Hobbit (2003) The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) The Lord of the Rings: War of the Ring (2003)

How old is Gandalf?

24,000 years old The closest approximation of Gandalf's physical age is 24,000 years old, according to Gandalf himself. Yet, various dates of key events in other Tolkien texts show that Gandalf has actually only walked in his physical form for just over two thousand years.

Is Hobbit worth watching?

Absolutely. They weren't on the level of LOTR but I never expected then to be. I would certainly recommend watching them if you liked LOTR. The second one is the best.

Is The Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings?

But, more than anything else, the reason The Hobbit is a better read is because it's more fun to read. The writing itself is written in a lighthearted way where the narrator inserts himself sometimes. Gandalf is fun and enjoys having a good time in The Hobbit, whereas in Lord of the Rings he's unbearably serious.

How old is Gollum?

589 The Lord of the Rings: Age of selected characters
CharacterAge in years
Gollum589
Gimli140
Bilbo129
Denethor89
9 satır daha

Why is The Hobbit so bad?

The Villains One of the main problems in adapting The Hobbit is that Smaug the dragon doesn't fit the mold of a modern villain, being little more than a hoarder with a bad temper. To solve the problem, Jackson's Smaug was more vicious than his book counterpart, and this alteration worked well enough for film.

Why did The Hobbit trilogy fail?

Hobbit lacked the focus of the LOTR movies and tried to correct the issue mid-stride in a way that just didn't work. ... Part of this is due to the fact that those films had so much more information they needed to cover. Lord of the Rings adapted 3 books (one per movie), whereas The Hobbit spread one book over three films.

How tall is Gandalf?

5'6" "Gandalf was shorter in stature than the other two; but his long white hair, his sweeping silver beard, and his broad shoulders, made him look like some wise king of ancient legend....
Gandalf
Physical Description
GenderMale
Height5'6"
Hair colorLong white, silver beard
13 satır daha

Is Gandalf a human?

As one of the Maiar, Gandalf was not a mortal Man but an angelic being who had taken human form. ... Along with the other Maiar who entered into the world as the five Wizards, he took on the specific form of an aged old man as a sign of his humility.

Who is better Gandalf or Dumbledore?

Gandalf is more fully fleshed-out, but as an immortal, he's not a normal person. ... Gandalf is greater than Dumbledore, although (or perhaps because) he had less power. He rallied all the free peoples of Middle-Earth to the cause, gave them heart, and sacrificed himself to save his friends and the quest in Moria.

Are the Hobbit movies good Reddit?

It does drag in the middle, but overall I think it's very solid in comparison to the other films and Martin Freeman is terrific as Bilbo. Desolation of Smaug has some great scenes and Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug is great as well as the CGI for Smaug.

Is Hobbit worth watching Reddit?

The films are certainly excessive. While they aren't have compelling as the LOTR trilogy, I enjoyed them because they are further adventures in that world. Give them a watch! They're a lot of fun, and as an avid Tolkien reader seeing more of Middle Earth and overall world development I enjoyed them for what they were.

Why is The Hobbit book so good?

The Hobbit is a great story because it's one that absolutely plays to the strengths of it's writer, and it isn't afraid to keep itself simple. ... The narration feels very characterized rather than matter-of-fact, sort of like the narrator is a dad reading a story to his kids.

Did Gollum eat babies?

Yes he did! We know that he killed and ate young orcs (goblins) for centuries when he lived beneath the Misty Mountains. The narrator tells us this in The Hobbit.

How old is Frodo human years?

The Lord of the Rings: Age of selected characters
CharacterAge in years
Frodo51
Boromir41
Samwise Gamgee39
Merry37
9 satır daha

Why does The Hobbit look so fake?

You might have heard that The Hobbit looks kind of weird. The movie was shot with a special camera developed by the founder of Oakley sunglasses (weirdly enough), at 48 frames per second (fps). That frame rate seem to make people generally unhappy.